Processed Foods Are Deadly Essay
23 March 2014
Processed Foods are Deadly
Our food is not safe to eat anymore. With all of the processing going on in the meat industries, there are no proper ways to truly know if the food is safe. The inspectors that are supposed to make sure our food is healthy, have failed multiple times to inform us on the hazardous chemicals that are being used throughout the food processing system. In California, a northern meat processing company recalled over 8.7 million ponds of beef products (Associated). The company, Rancho Feeding Corporations, processed diseased and unhealthy animals. The amount of meat that was processed was about a years worth of food. This is the type of problems we have to worry about when eating meat these days.
Due to the lack of attention, or care some would say, a meat-processing plant in Toronto, Canada, there were twenty-one deaths connected to a bacteria found in the meat company. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency said, "…An environmental sampling program at the plant, which swabs the surfaces of equipment rather than testing the product itself, had identified positive results for the dangerous bacteria…(Smith)." The results were given to the company earlier in the year, and they simply just filed them without any action of change. About three months after knowing about the bacteria the Maple Leaf had the largest recall in Canadian history (Smith). Hearing about these stories makes me wonder where all the food I have eaten and the food I will eat in the future is coming from, and whether or not there will be hazardous chemicals involved. Not knowing is the scariest thing about the entire topic.
There have been higher discussions among those who have done research on the effects of eating processed meats because of all the dangers. In the article, Eating Bacon, Sausage, and Lunch Meats is Risky Business, researchers from Harvard University said, "People who ate a daily serving of processed meat such as bacon, sausage, and lunch meat boosted their risk of heart disease by forty-two percent, and of diabetes by nineteen percent (Flam). In processed foods, especially meats, there are different chemicals being added just to preserve them like salt and nitrate. There has also been a link between diet and cancer. According to The World Cancer Research Fund, "Consumers should stop buying and eating all processed meat products for the rest of their lives (Processed). They discovered that processed meats are preserved and colored to look fresh with a chemical commonly known as sodium nitrate. This chemical has been shown to lead to cancer-causing nitrosamines in our bodies. A study from the University of Hawaii the researchers discovered that, "Processed meats increase the risk of pancreatic cancer by sixty-seven...
Loading: Checking Spelling0%
Obesity: Processed Foods and the Government´s Role1046 words - 4 pages Because the government choices not to closely regulate the food citizens of the United States of America, people are making poor eating decisions, leaving sixty-seven percent of Americans either overweight or obese [2005-2006}. (Is Obesity a Disease?) But what if it wasn’t really obese people’s fault for being overweight, but instead the fault of food companies that provide cheaply priced and processed food that is full of perseverates, trans...
Food as Medicine Essay3046 words - 12 pages Foods as Medicine Since a long time ago, human has acknowledged the health benefits of foods. However, with the development of chemical drugs and pills, they have forgotten that the food they eat are directly linked to their health. Foods, in facts are the best medicines and therefore we should take into account carefully how we perceive and use them. Firstly, choosing the right diet and the right food to eat can help improve health...
Processed Food Should or Should not Be Banned from School Meals?3544 words - 14 pages Processed food should be banned from school meals due to increasing health issues in children, increasing academic deficiency and increasing production cost to produce processed foods. There are people who would oppose to this idea due to population growth and an increasing food demand. However, this escalating demand of food is forcing the food industry and other government agencies to resolve the current hunger and lack of resources issues, by...
The Beauty Detox Solution and Foods1233 words - 5 pages “The connection between food and beauty is incredibly powerful. Just by changing the foods you eat you can radically change the way you look and feel” (Snyder, 2013). Kimberly Snyder is the author of the Beauty Detox Solution and Beauty Detox Foods. While backpacking for three years throughout 50 countries, she learned how health and beauty are viewed. Because of her fascination with what she learned, she became a certified nutritionist when she...
Stop the Ridiculous Fast Food Trend1864 words - 7 pages Processed foods are everywhere; they are fast, convenient and cheap, consequently; they come at a cost to our health. Eating processed foods that contain amounts high fructose corn syrup, sodium-containing additives, trans fats (or trans fatty acids), synthetic dyes, and/or preservatives in our diet regularly is unhealthy and may cause many health problems such as; obesity, organ failure, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and...
An Analysis of Whole Foods Market1234 words - 5 pages Whole Foods Market was founded in Austin, Texas, after four local businesspeople decided that the natural food industry was ready for a supermarket format. The first Whole Foods was opened in 1980 with only a staffing of 19 people. After being one of the first natural food stores coming out it had immediate success. In 2006, Whole Foods Market had evolved into the world’s largest retail chain of natural and organic food supermarkets. With...
Negative Effects of High Fructose Corn Syrup and Potential Replacements1659 words - 7 pages The Negative Effects of High Fructose Corn Syrup and the Potential Alternatives that Can Replace It Abstract: High fructose corn syrup (HFCS), like many other unhealthy constituents that are used in foods, is cheap and retains the taste of the natural products it emulates, possibly even surpassing them in many areas. However, experiments have shown that fructose is not an ideal sugar for human consumption, not to mention the fact that the use...
Plant Based Diet1262 words - 5 pages Plant Based Diet Research shows that there are approximately one million Americans who are 100% vegan (Harris Interactive Service Bureau, 2013). It is unfortunate that the majority of the population is missing out on the opportunity to easily better their health and wellness, especially when the rate of heart disease, obesity, and diabetes has drastically increased over the last fifty years. It is completely within one’s power to prevent those...
Misleading Food Labels1789 words - 7 pages More and More people are becoming concerned about what they eat, especially if they consume food products that are manufactured in food industries. However, it is hard to know what exactly you are consuming if food industries provide false nutrition content and mislead consumers by placing false advertisements on the packaging. When a company produces a product that contains misleading label, consumers are not receiving complete information about...
Clean Eating701 words - 3 pages Clean Eating Eating clean is simply stripping your diet with unhealthy foods. It is not a diet but a lifestyle choice wherein you only eat whole, unrefined, and unprocessed foods. This allows you to eat more and weigh less by making smart food choices. Eating clean can lead to proper nutrition, weight loss, and disease prevention. The concept of clean eating may seem to be overwhelming at first, especially if it involves a lot of changes....
Whole Foods Market910 words - 4 pages Whole Foods The mission of Whole Foods Market is "to offer the highest quality, least processed, most flavorful and naturally preserved foods" (Nelson and Quick 352). The company uses rational decision making in merchandising and operations by employing a decentralized business structure. This means that ideas can be thoroughly processed and analyzed because decisions are made by people who will actually see the results of changes made. In...
What exactly does “processed food” mean? According to a new position paper from the American Society For Nutrition (ASN) processing means “the alteration of foods from the state in which they are harvested or raised to better preserve them and feed consumers.” By this definition, processed foods encompass everything from washed raw spinach and frozen strawberries to Betty Crocker’s Cheesy Scalloped boxed potatoes (a box of the latter is made up of reconstituted ingredients held together with partially hydrogenated oils, artificial dyes, and the sodium equivalent of 60 potato chips per serving).
In fact, according to the ASN, food processing “began in prehistoric times.” The paper argues that what we do in our kitchens is really no different from what the food industry does in its commercial processing plants (although I have yet to meet anyone who can partially hydrogenate oil or make aspartame at home). Rather than differentiate between various types or scales of processing, the group used its own journal, the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, to proclaim that: “processed foods contribute to the health of populations.”
At a time when one in eight Americans has been diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes and one in three American adults lives with hypertension, this vague and innocuous definition of processing does more harm than good.
Yes, some degree of “processing” has always been key to preserving and preparing food. But recent history points to something very different. Take potatoes, for example. In the 1960s, processed potatoes (i.e., French fries, boxed mashed potatoes, potato chips) accounted for 35 percent of U.S. potato production; by the 2000s, that figure climbed to 64 percent. Similarly, in the 1950s, Americans consumed 109 pounds of caloric sweeteners per capita. By 2000, that figure had skyrocketed 39 percent to 152 pounds, largely due to the switch from cane sugar to high fructose corn syrup in the 1980s, an ingredient which quickly became ubiquitous in highly processed foods.
Why doesn’t the ASN’s position paper bother to differentiate between degrees of processing? Well, it might have something to do with the fact that the ASN is sponsored by some of the most notorious producers of processed foods–including Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, McDonald’s, and General Mills. Criticism of processed foods, or the very products on which these companies’ bottom lines depend, would endanger such relationships. As New York University’s Dr. Marion Nestle said to MedPage (reg. required), “because members of the [ASN] committee have financial connections with food companies, the position statement is conflicted and its conclusions come as no surprise.”
It’s tough to say for sure, but this type of corporate sponsorship may be part of what motivated the authors of the statement to argue that processed food should be solely evaluated based on its nutrient contribution and degree of convenience. In that case, Froot Loops Marshmallow cereal would get a thumbs up, as it is easily portable and fortified with 11 vitamins and minerals; never mind the 14 grams of added sugar per serving, the inclusion of five artificial dyes, and the presence of partially hydrogenated oils.
Michele Simon, public health lawyer and president of Eat Drink Politics, thinks the conflicts of interest are evident: “The paper has industry spin written all over it. Just wait for the major processed food companies to start pointing to it as ‘sound science’ to defend their unhealthy products.”
Indeed, this myopic look at processed food is music to the food industry’s ears. When we examine nutrition through a reductionist lens of grams of fiber or percentages of vitamins and minerals and ignore actual ingredient lists, it’s easier to make an argument for the “healthier” versions of highly processed foods.
A serving of 22 almonds does not offer the iron, vitamin A, vitamin D, or vitamin B12 (all fortified) that Froot Loops do. The almonds do, however, have heart-healthy fats and antioxidants (which are not reflected on a nutrition label) without the added sugar or artificial additives. But the real tragedy here is that by ASN’s account, sugary cereals and dry roasted almonds both fit into the same category of processed foods.
The ASN’s position paper goes on to state that “if enrichment and fortification were not present, a large percentage of the population would have had inadequate intakes of vitamins A, C, E, D, and calcium.” This, of course, is only an issue when intake of whole foods is low. Consider that one sweet potato, a half cup of spinach or a half cup of carrots each delivers well over a day’s worth of vitamin A, or that a mere half cup of red peppers contains more than the daily recommendation of vitamin C.
If a large percentage of the population is low in vitamins A and C, it points to a problematically low intake of whole, real foods. In that case, the question we should be asking is: Why, when so many available foods offer nutrients in abundance, is our nutrient intake so low? The answer would at least begin to shed light on systemic, widespread issues that affect public health—and we might find that solution requires more than sprinkling isolated nutrients into highly processed products.
Even worse, the ASN defends processed foods by arguing that reformulation (i.e., products like whole grain Teddy Grahams) has nutritional advantages. ASN even states that “educat[ing] the public in processing techniques” and “defin[ing] and support[ing] food processing research” are two of the food industry’s key responsibilities, essentially co-signing further conflicts of interest. Keep in mind that the food industry has fought tooth and nail to keep artificial trans fats as a Generally Recognized as Safe ingredient, despite the years of solid evidence that show how destructive they are to our cardiovascular system.
ASN also points to “appetite-suppressing” compounds which are currently being studied for potential inclusion in foods as a potentially positive development. Interestingly, however, there is no mention of the science that goes into creating addictive junk food, as documented thoroughly by Michael Moss in Salt, Sugar, Fat.
Fortunately, many public health experts without ties to industry have spoken critically of processed foods. Dr. Carlos Monteiro of Brazil’s University of Sao Paolo, for instance, coined the term “ultra-processed food” to refer to “attractive, hyper-palatable, cheap, ready-to-consume food products that are characteristically energy-dense, fatty, sugary or salty and generally obesogenic.” While that definition could use some tweaking, it sets important and much needed parameters. (My issue with these foods is not so much fat content itself as the presence of highly refined, unhealthy fats, for example, and I prefer health-focused, rather than weight-focused dialogue).
Public health and nutrition dialogues need clear, explicit messages. Dietary fats, for instance, have varying qualities; while trans fats are a cardiovascular atrocity, monounsaturated fats improve heart health. Naturally-occurring sugars and added sugars are very different animals. The same goes for processed foods. How is it that a national nutrition organization can simply choose not to recognize that cooking a pot of oatmeal is vastly different from making a Three Musketeers bar in a processing plant?
It’s a real shame that, rather than clarify the conversation on processed foods, ASN’s position paper only confuses the American public further while giving the food industry unwarranted kudos and a pass to continue business as usual. Then again, the latter happens so often you might think that it too had been going on since prehistoric times.